<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bring on the Accessibility Lawsuits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://collegewebguy.com/2008/08/28/bring-on-the-accessibility-lawsuits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://collegewebguy.com/2008/08/28/bring-on-the-accessibility-lawsuits/</link>
	<description>He’s employed at a university. He calls himself a web designer. These are his brain droppings.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 13:39:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://collegewebguy.com/2008/08/28/bring-on-the-accessibility-lawsuits/comment-page-1/#comment-775</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegewebguy.com/?p=236#comment-775</guid>
		<description>The section 508 guidelines seem to imply that if it is produced by the school, it must be accessible.  This extends beyond just the web (or a portal).

In Oklahoma, they&#039;ve adopted the section 508 guidelines almost verbatim as state law as well, and where they differ the OK law is more robust.  I wrote a draft of some handbooks on the law and what it really meant for those of us trying to follow it.

Section 508 includes all technology: from web to video to the procurement of software, hardware, telephone equipment, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The section 508 guidelines seem to imply that if it is produced by the school, it must be accessible.  This extends beyond just the web (or a portal).</p>
<p>In Oklahoma, they&#8217;ve adopted the section 508 guidelines almost verbatim as state law as well, and where they differ the OK law is more robust.  I wrote a draft of some handbooks on the law and what it really meant for those of us trying to follow it.</p>
<p>Section 508 includes all technology: from web to video to the procurement of software, hardware, telephone equipment, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Fienen</title>
		<link>http://collegewebguy.com/2008/08/28/bring-on-the-accessibility-lawsuits/comment-page-1/#comment-769</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Fienen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegewebguy.com/?p=236#comment-769</guid>
		<description>My question has always been, what are college&#039;s liabilities with things like portals?  Does everything a college does online HAVE to be accessible, or is it enough to have accessible alternatives (i.e. a phone line or other alternative media way to do things)?  Our state guidelines are a little ambiguous, but seem to imply that if it&#039;s a system, and it&#039;s used by people, it has to be accessible, regardless of alternatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My question has always been, what are college&#8217;s liabilities with things like portals?  Does everything a college does online HAVE to be accessible, or is it enough to have accessible alternatives (i.e. a phone line or other alternative media way to do things)?  Our state guidelines are a little ambiguous, but seem to imply that if it&#8217;s a system, and it&#8217;s used by people, it has to be accessible, regardless of alternatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

