<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tools vs Talent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://collegewebguy.com/2009/03/27/tools-vs-talent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://collegewebguy.com/2009/03/27/tools-vs-talent/</link>
	<description>He’s employed at a university. He calls himself a web designer. These are his brain droppings.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 13:39:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: OtherWebGuy</title>
		<link>http://collegewebguy.com/2009/03/27/tools-vs-talent/comment-page-1/#comment-1075</link>
		<dc:creator>OtherWebGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegewebguy.com/?p=399#comment-1075</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post, Drew. This is a good one, and it&#039;s one that&#039;s particularly close to my heart. Personally, I am a Web developer, not a designer. There are many parts of my job that cannot simply be taught, but need to be experienced. As a designer, that experience becomes even more important.

Although we have begun to move away from the era when everyone with a copy of FrontPage thought they were a Webmaster, there is still a good bit of that out there (though, now they&#039;re using Dreamweaver and Photoshop to make that claim).

There is something to be said for it. Whether you&#039;re talking about artwork or something more technical like writing code, that talent and experience is always necessary. You just won&#039;t learn those things by reading a book and/or sitting in a classroom (fortunately or unfortunately).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post, Drew. This is a good one, and it&#8217;s one that&#8217;s particularly close to my heart. Personally, I am a Web developer, not a designer. There are many parts of my job that cannot simply be taught, but need to be experienced. As a designer, that experience becomes even more important.</p>
<p>Although we have begun to move away from the era when everyone with a copy of FrontPage thought they were a Webmaster, there is still a good bit of that out there (though, now they&#8217;re using Dreamweaver and Photoshop to make that claim).</p>
<p>There is something to be said for it. Whether you&#8217;re talking about artwork or something more technical like writing code, that talent and experience is always necessary. You just won&#8217;t learn those things by reading a book and/or sitting in a classroom (fortunately or unfortunately).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://collegewebguy.com/2009/03/27/tools-vs-talent/comment-page-1/#comment-1073</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 18:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://collegewebguy.com/?p=399#comment-1073</guid>
		<description>You make a really valid point here. Just knowing how to do something doesn&#039;t make a person great at it and we&#039;d think of that for doctors, lawyers or anything else, but when it comes to folks who do technical things, a lot of people assume that it&#039;s some skill that translates well to anyone who is supposedly &quot;really good at that computer stuff.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make a really valid point here. Just knowing how to do something doesn&#8217;t make a person great at it and we&#8217;d think of that for doctors, lawyers or anything else, but when it comes to folks who do technical things, a lot of people assume that it&#8217;s some skill that translates well to anyone who is supposedly &#8220;really good at that computer stuff.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

